Review of High Definition Commentary: Galatians – Brent Niedergall

Every Sunday, more preachers than we would like to think stand behind pulpits and incorrectly explain various features of the Greek language in the New Testament. Grammatical misunderstandings of the aorist tense form and the present active imperative have been carefully passed down from generation to generation along with lexical misconceptions of words like ἀγαπάω and ἐκκλησία. Bible-believing, orthodox preachers, who love God are feeding their congregation linguistic lies out of an ignorance of the Greek language. That’s too bad. But it’s also too bad that where a knowledge of biblical Greek can actually bring so much to the table in our preaching and teaching, it is often ignored. Steve Runge has done preachers and teachers a great service by writing High Definition Commentary: Galatians, a resource that uses Greek correctly so preachers and teachers can improve what they’re bringing to the table when feeding their congregations. 
— Read on niedergall.com/review-of-high-definition-commentary-galatians/

The pestilence that stalks in darkness: aefenglommung

Cat Stevens (now, Yusuf Islam) said a few years ago of his song, “Moonshadow,” that its inspiration was a happy trip to Spain as a young man. Away from city lights, he delighted in a bright moon that cast his shadow on the ground. But songs acquire myths to explain them when the artist does not. The tale going around when I was in college (and this song was new) was that Stevens had been very ill with some disease (rumored to be tuberculosis) and he was living with the fear of its return.
— Read on aefenglommung.livejournal.com/1627486.html

I appreciate the folks who are trying to keep baseball news flowing, but I find it hard to maintain interest. I care about the game, not the biz.

Progressivism and Power: aefenglommung

One of the first principles of progressive political philosophy is the undifferentiated nature of Power. Whether Mussolini or Wilson, progressivism hungers for Power to do — everything. It rejects the American Founding, which placed limits upon Power, and set Power against Power, so that one must always ask, “Power to do what?” when considering any office or body within our constitutional system. Progressives believe that power-to-do-what is irrelevant. Likewise, they reject the idea that different kinds of power reside in different bailiwicks. Enumerated powers? Checks and Balances? No. All Power is just — Power, Power to do everything.
— Read on aefenglommung.livejournal.com/1626604.html